SC defers Balwant Singh Rajoana – 1995 killer of Punjab CM Beant Singh – plea for release
Senior advocate Rohatgi, appearing for Rajoana, urged the bench to grant temporary release to Rajoana.
The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a plea seeking an SIT probe into the targeted killings of Kashmiri Pandits which led to their exodus from the valley.
A bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and C.T. Ravikumar told the counsel, representing the NGO We the Citizens, to raise the grievances before the Central government.
Advocate Barun Kumar Sinha, representing the petitioner, urged the bench to hear his submissions highlighting the plight of the Kashmiri Pandits.
Advertisement
The bench said he should approach the Centre.
After a brief hearing in the matter, the petitioner’s counsel agreed to withdraw the petition.
The bench allowed the counsel to make a representation before the Central government and the concerned authorities.
The plea sought direction for the rehabilitation of those who migrated out of the valley and also sought the SIT be formed to identify those who “aided and abetted the genocide” of the Hindu and Sikh communities between 1989-2003.
A curative petition, filed by Roots in Kashmir, is also pending in the apex court seeking a probe either by the CBI or National Investigation Agency (NIA) into the alleged mass-murders and genocide of Kashmiri Pandits during 1989-90.
In March, the plea filed by Roots in Kashmir challenged an order of the top court passed in 2017 dismissing the plea saying, “the instances referred in the petition pertain to the year 1989-90, and more than 27 years have passed by since then. No fruitful purpose would emerge, as the evidence is unlikely to be available at this late juncture”.
A statement from the organisation said that in support of the curative petition, a certificate has been issued by senior advocate and president, Supreme Court Bar Association, Vikas Singh.
The curative petition also cited a 2018 Delhi High Court order on Sajjan Kumar in the anti-Sikh riots case.
The high court allowing the appeal said: “It is important to assure those countless victims waiting patiently that despite the challenges, truth will prevail and justice will be done…”
Advertisement
